Rubies remain one of the most popular of all the precious gems and, following the recent publicity surrounding Jessica Simpson’s ruby and diamond engagement ring, are likely to become even more so.
A few years ago this would have been good news, but today it may spell disaster for bench jewelers and retailers alike. In the past week, I’ve had calls from two jewelers who found out the hard way that working on rubies isn’t what it used to be because the rubies themselves aren’t what they used to be: more and more rubies that are reaching the bench look like ruby, but sure don’t act like ruby!
Have you come across a ruby that broke at the corner while you tried to set it, even though you didn’t exert undue pressure? Or had one crumble into a molten glob when using the torch, or become deeply and irreparably acid-etched from the pickle — across the entire stone, top and bottom? This isn’t the typical experience one has when working with rubies. So why is this happening now?
What’s happening is that most of the low-quality, inexpensive rubies now being sold in the market are not just “treated rubies” but something altogether different—a mixture of low-quality corundum infused with lead-glass. The amount of lead-glass present in the stones now in the marketplace often exceeds 25% and, in many cases represents 40% or more of the entire stone! These are being called “composites” by an increasing number of laboratories, and the Accredited Gemologists Association (AGA) has taken the position, based on FTC guidelines and other sources, that these are actually “imitation” products because of the huge percentage of glass, and that they cannot be sold ethically and morally as genuine rubies. If they don’t “act” like a ruby, nor have the longevity of a ruby, nor have the value of a ruby (while some sell for $50 per carat or more, most sell for under $10 per carat in any size and shape, and much less when purchased in quantity), then how can they be sold as a ruby?
These composites should not be confused with “treated” ruby, in which glass fillings have been used to reduce the visibility of internal fractures, or with those treated by traditional techniques that involve unusually high heat which can result in minute residues of glass in surface-reaching fissures; such rubies have been around for many years, and the amount of glass is far less than what is found in these new composites.
Another important difference is that the glass used in these traditionally treated rubies is not a lead-glass, so one can quickly and easily judge the overall clarity and whether or not there are any durability issues in the stone.
This is not the case with composites; with the use of lead-glass in the composites, it is very difficult to determine where the glass ends and the ruby begins, so it is easy to miss seeing fractures, the planes between the glass and corundum, or how much is glass is present versus ruby.
If bench jewelers are unable to distinguish the difference between a treated ruby and one of these composite rubies, the outcome can be devastating. If the torch is kept on them, or they are left in the jeweler’s pickle just a tad too long, irreparable damage can result—not just to the stone, but to the jeweler’s reputation. In addition, the jeweler will probably be held responsible for replacing the stone with something far more costly than the original stone.
Develop an eye for distinguishing characteristics of these composite stones, and inform your customers about the true nature of their stones before beginning work on them.
Anyone interested in knowing more about these stones, please contact me at www.AntoinetteMatlins.com. I’ll be glad to send you an in-depth piece I’ve written on all of the ways in which these are different from anything else in the market. Also, go to the AGA website for more information and excellent images.